DBMM Forum

Armies => Book 2 => Topic started by: landmeister on January 30, 2009, 10:55:13 PM

Title: Errata on list 9
Post by: landmeister on January 30, 2009, 10:55:13 PM: The Syracusian C-in-C is marked with an asterisk, but no asterisk is included on the notes. Does anyone know why? ???

Thank you
Title: Re: Errata on list 9
Post by: MikeCampbell on February 02, 2009, 11:51:04 PM: I don't have the published book 2 with me, but in the last draft it is to do with Phyrrus being CinC on the last 2 lines of the notes.
Title: Re: Errata on list 9
Post by: landmeister on February 03, 2009, 03:37:12 PM: Quote from: MikeCampbell on February 02, 2009, 11:51:04 PM
I don't have the published book 2 with me, but in the last draft it is to do with Phyrrus being CinC on the last 2 lines of the notes.

Interesting. The final actual 2 lines ob the list say nothing about Phyrrus. Could you write them here, please? ;)
Title: Re: Errata on list 9
Post by: MikeCampbell on February 03, 2009, 08:51:32 PM: I should have checked my book 2 at home sorry - here's hte lines from the draft:

Quote
*If Pyrrhic allies are used, they can include their list?s full number of El and Kn (F), Pyrrhos becomes C-in-C and the Syracusan C-in-C is not used. Pyrrhos? command must include all and only Pyrrhic troops.
Title: Re: Errata on list 9
Post by: landmeister on February 04, 2009, 10:08:08 AM: Ok. Thank you very much.
Title: Re: Errata on list 9
Post by: MikeCampbell on February 09, 2009, 01:31:57 AM: I finally got around to looking it up on hte weekend - the lines about Phyruss are in the published list...but without an asterix........I dunno whether that means there is an asterix too many in the list, or 1 too few in the notes!
Title: Re: Errata on list 9
Post by: landmeister on February 10, 2009, 01:44:14 PM: This what I spotted :D. Do you know if Mr. Barker is going to publish an errata sheet?
Title: Re: Errata on list 9
Post by: MikeCampbell on February 10, 2009, 09:44:53 PM: probably sooner or later, but that's a guess on my part