DBMM Forum

General Category => Rules Questions => Topic started by: landmeister on August 18, 2010, 06:09:15 PM

Title: This about commands
Post by: landmeister on August 18, 2010, 06:09:15 PM
I read that now a command must have at least 4 ME of mounted and/or foot. Does it mean that now we can't make commands with WWg and a general only? I play with a later Hungarian including a subgeneral with 4 WWg only. They are train, not foot... :-\
Title: Re: This about commands
Post by: foxgom on August 18, 2010, 07:30:01 PM
Hi

Agree.

Your command is illegal (P14 Para 1)

neil
Title: Re: This about commands
Post by: LAP1964 on August 18, 2010, 10:05:53 PM
That's correct.It was done to stop the unbreakable command i.e.Gen+4 Exp. :D
LES
Title: Re: This about commands
Post by: landmeister on August 19, 2010, 07:09:27 AM
Ok. Thank you very much.
Title: Re: This about commands
Post by: landmeister on August 19, 2010, 12:42:24 PM
That's correct.It was done to stop the unbreakable command i.e.Gen+4 Exp. :D
LES

But this would be legal because Exp count as mounted troops.  ;)
Title: Re: This about commands
Post by: LAP1964 on August 19, 2010, 12:46:23 PM
That's correct.It was done to stop the unbreakable command i.e.Gen+4 Exp. :D
LES

But this would be legal because Exp count as mounted troops.  ;)
No as the Exps don't come to at least 4 ME. :)(Page 14,1st paragraph)
LES
Title: Re: This about commands
Post by: Orcoteuthis on August 19, 2010, 08:37:15 PM
To stop the general + Exp or Hd (I) commands, the ME restriction would have been sufficient. I don't recall precisely what, but Phil had something against all-train commands, hence the foot/mtd criterion.
Title: Re: This about commands
Post by: landmeister on August 19, 2010, 09:50:57 PM
No as the Exps don't come to at least 4 ME. :)(Page 14,1st paragraph)
LES

Oooops! You're right!  ;D ;)