Author Topic: WWg(S) in Close Combat  (Read 1484 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Marcel Bos

  • Bd(O)
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
    • View Profile
WWg(S) in Close Combat
« on: June 19, 2021, 03:42:48 PM »
Two Bd(O) move in Close Combat with the side-edge of WWg(S).

The rules (Turning to Face Flank or Rear contact) say:
a) As train, the WWg won’t Turn to Face and
b) WWg(S) count edges normally.

How will this be handled in Combat?

LawrenceG1

  • Bd(O)
  • ***
  • Posts: 182
    • View Profile
Re: WWg(S) in Close Combat
« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2021, 11:15:29 AM »
Since the edge counts normally:

The blade adjacent to the front corner (i.e. the "front half" of the flank edge) fights. Is is in close combat with the flank edge of the WWg so the WWg gets a -1 combat factor for enemy in close combat with its flank.

The other blade has not met the criteria for moving into close combat against a flank edge, therefore does not fight. However, if the first blade recoils or is destroyed, it will adjust its contact by sliding 80p to contact the "front half" of the flank edge. It will fight in the following bound.

If the WWg just loses, nothing happens. If the WWg scores half or less, it is destroyed.

Marcel Bos

  • Bd(O)
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
    • View Profile
Re: WWg(S) in Close Combat
« Reply #2 on: July 05, 2021, 08:35:29 PM »
Thanks again Lawrence!

But what if the Wwg(S) was a Bge(S).
Do I understand it correctly that in that case the contacted side of the Bge(S) will be the front edge, the Bge(S) fights both Bd(O) in turn this bound and the Wwg(S) gets a -1 for a overlap (at least in the first combat)?

It seems a completely different combat situation.

LawrenceG1

  • Bd(O)
  • ***
  • Posts: 182
    • View Profile
Re: WWg(S) in Close Combat
« Reply #3 on: July 06, 2021, 11:05:14 AM »
Thanks again Lawrence!

But what if the Wwg(S) was a Bge(S).
Do I understand it correctly that in that case the contacted side of the Bge(S) will be the front edge, the Bge(S) fights both Bd(O) in turn this bound and the Wwg(S) gets a -1 for a overlap (at least in the first combat)?

It seems a completely different combat situation.

Correct, assuming you meant to write: "... the Bge(S)  gets a -1 for a overlap (at least in the first combat)".