Author Topic: Birmingham Playtest 2007 Results  (Read 5049 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

toby

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 0
    • View Profile
Birmingham Playtest 2007 Results
« on: February 24, 2007, 08:36:24 PM »
The results for the Birmingham Playtest on the 24th February 2007 were:

PlaceNameArmyPoints
1=Dave RuddockSkythian and Early Hu40
1=Chris JolleySicilian40
1=David ThompsonWest Sudanese40
4David MatherHittite Empire36
5Stuart WhighamSouthern Hsiung-Nu/Arabo-Aramean34
6=Geoff PearsonSamurai33
6=Mike PickeringBiblical33
8Chris HanleyArab Conquest32
9Toby PartridgeCentral Asian City States28
10=Norman WhapshottHunnic25
10=Steve BownsBiblical25
12Nial TaylorSung Chinese24
13Tony DennisMarian Roman21
14Roy LoachSwedish Leidang15
15Ray BriggsFeudal English10
16=Gordon HarrowSassanid Persian6
16=Sue Laflin-BarkerAncient British6
18Phil BarkerTuareg2

Everyone had a great time and think and many thanks are due to Gordon for organising it all and to everyone who took part.
« Last Edit: February 28, 2007, 11:07:48 PM by Geoff Pearson »

toby

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Birmingham Playtest 2007 Results
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2007, 10:40:09 AM »
Not sure. They were 20mm, and I think one of them was Egyptian. 

Adrian Garbett

  • Guest
Re: Birmingham Playtest 2007 Results
« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2007, 05:31:52 PM »
Why am I not filled with confidence that the author of the rules finished last :-)

Ade

toby

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Birmingham Playtest 2007 Results
« Reply #3 on: February 25, 2007, 06:45:53 PM »
I suppose that it does at least suggest that his integrity is such that he hasn't taken the opportunity to make his own playing style and armies unbeatable.

Doug M.

  • Guest
Re: Birmingham Playtest 2007 Results
« Reply #4 on: February 26, 2007, 06:15:56 AM »
Phil has never been known as a playing guru..  although I would have expected him and Sue to do a bit better.  Were there any interesting comments to come out? I know Peter Barrett here has concerns over the Delayed Start strategem, and it would seem that the -2 ME broken command rule is going to be modified a little.

It would be interesting to hear what the Ladywell modifications are, as we are playing a current tournament using the 11th January version and it would be nice to know if there are any major changes before we report back our concerns.. (too late of course).

Doug M. 

DaveMather

  • Bd(O)
  • ***
  • Posts: 133
    • View Profile
Re: Birmingham Playtest 2007 Results
« Reply #5 on: February 26, 2007, 05:55:18 PM »
Doug

There was nothing that hadn't been tabled on the DBMMList site over the last few weeks - and post Ladywood Phil has put the "final" changes on the DBMMList site - changes to 2FE (check what you could do with 2 x 2FE full sized Marshes as a defender to wreck your opponents deployement), gradings, temporary minuses/army baggage .  You will pick up most of the minor differences between 11th Jan and Ladywood by using the advanced search in the DBMM List - for posts after jan 11 2007 - author contains barker and  message body contains "try this" - you need the quotes - this should pick up most of the changes - but there is nothing major.  It was not easy for us to tell what had changed as Phil had this time round abandoned the italics. 

Regards


David Mather



Doug M.

  • Guest
Re: Birmingham Playtest 2007 Results
« Reply #6 on: February 28, 2007, 05:40:54 AM »
Thanks Dave.

I guess we are all just waiting for the actual printing then. Given the timeframe, it hardly appears worthwhile to try and incorporate the changes into the copies we are currently using.

Hopefully, the pre-order will also arrive quickly, I would be very curious as to how mnay Caliver are doing as a first print run?

regards

Doug

mike.pickering

  • Guest
Re: Birmingham Playtest 2007 Results
« Reply #7 on: March 05, 2007, 09:57:16 AM »
Interesting list of army's.
what was Mike Pickering Biblical list exactly?

I can send the list through to you if this is still of interest?
Cheers
Mike