Here are some errata from the new version of Book 1.
This first lot are errata carried over from the first edition which weren't addressed...
1/4 – Zagros Highlanders: How are we to construct Sumero-Akkadian allies for this list? The Akkadian list as constructed doesn’t provide for generals in the specified time period when it can provide allies for the Zagros Highlanders.
1/5 – Early Elamite: From 2600BC to 1400BC the upgrade available for the C-in-C also applies to the sub-general; this isn’t the case after 1400BC. Why not?
1/6 – Early Bedouin: From 2200BC to 2000BC the Amurru C-in-C and sub-general can be upgraded to Reg Pk (I), although the list doesn’t provide for any other Pk. Is this intended?
1/15 – Later Amorite: Who is Iasmah-adad king of? Babylonia? Assyria? Others?
1/35 – Cypriot: Upgrades for sub-generals aren’t available after 665BC. Why not?
1/41 – Medes etc: Is it intended that Medes from 620BC should be able to get up to 3 sub-generals?
1/52 – EHG: Thessalian allies in Athenian list, minimum 3 LH(O) is illegal, should be 4.
1/53 – Saitic Egyptian: Can Greek Sp (O) support Spartan Sp (S) as Spartiates can in EHG and LHG lists?
1/57 – Etruscan League: Can Sp (S) be concentrated within a command or must they be fielded 1 to each command? If the latter, can any elements support them?
1/59 – Tullian Roman: Is it intended that there are no troops which can legally support a Sp (S) C-in-C?
= = = =
On top of that, there are errors which have appeared in the new list books, thanks to changes which have been made.
1/14 – Early Northern Barbarians: before 1400BC in Europe, should generals also be regraded to something not impetuous?
1/22 – NKE: Just confirming, if you downgrade the infantry to irregular, they’re not bound by the restrictions applying to armies with three sub-generals?
1/35 – Cypriot: After 665BC and after 490BC, can sub-generals be regraded the same as C-in-C?
