Armies > Book 3
Errata - Book 3 2nd edition
Barritus:
Here are some errata from the new version of Book 3.
This first lot are errata carried over from the first edition which weren't addressed...
3/17 – Maurikian Byzantine: How do you calculate an ally contingent for LPIA, if you field 4 of the 9-12 Kavallarioi as Cursores?
3/34 – Andalusian: Didn’t need to use the N word when “black” or “African” are perfectly acceptable substitutes.
3/65 – Nikephorian Byzantine: The restriction on using Lombards with Klibanophoroi is pointless as the list separates them geographically anyway. But does it mean the Rus allies should also be geographically localised?
3/74 – Seljuq Turk: Can Turkoman ally generals command “Turkish” foot?
3/75 – Islamic Berber: Didn’t need to use the N word when “black” or “African” are perfectly acceptable substitutes.
= = = =
On top of that, there are errors which have appeared in the new list books, thanks to changes which have been made.
3/19 – Welsh: How is Owain Glyndwr to be used as an Ally? He’s specifically listed as North Welsh, and the only ally the English can get is South Welsh.
3/22 – Maya: The restriction preventing Ah Camul and Toltec-Chichimecs together is pointless as they’re temporally distinct.
3/24 – Middle Anglo-Saxon: The restriction preventing Sp (I) from supporting Sp (O) is pointless as there aren’t any Sp (O) in the list.
3/73 – Communal Italian: Can Caroccio be used in allied contingents in Papal Italian army if the player wishes?
Barritus:
Middle Anglo Saxon: according to the list, the Bts can only take Sp. Should they be able to take Bd instead?
Barritus:
Viking and Leidang: The C-in-C must be Bd (O) from 850BC?
Barritus:
Late T'ang and Five Dynasties: The Turkish Irr LH (S) are marked as being available to the Later T'ang. Shouldn't that be Late T'ang, given that the Later T'ang are a different list altogether?
Barritus:
Buyid and other Dailami Dynasties: Is it intended that Insubordinate Dailami Ax and Bw are downgraded to irregular but not the Ps?
Also, the restriction preventing you from using Dailami Cv if extra Ghulams are used is pointless, given they can’t be used in the same army.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version