Errata on list 9

[landmeister]

The Syracusian C-in-C is marked with an asterisk, but no asterisk is included on the notes. Does anyone know why? 

Thank you

[MikeCampbell]

I don't have the published book 2 with me, but in the last draft it is to do with Phyrrus being CinC on the last 2 lines of the notes.

[landmeister]

I don't have the published book 2 with me, but in the last draft it is to do with Phyrrus being CinC on the last 2 lines of the notes.

Interesting. The final actual 2 lines ob the list say nothing about Phyrrus. Could you write them here, please? 

[MikeCampbell]

I should have checked my book 2 at home sorry - here's hte lines from the draft:

*If Pyrrhic allies are used, they can include their list?s full number of El and Kn (F), Pyrrhos becomes C-in-C and the Syracusan C-in-C is not used. Pyrrhos? command must include all and only Pyrrhic troops.

[landmeister]

Ok. Thank you very much.

[MikeCampbell]

I finally got around to looking it up on hte weekend - the lines about Phyruss are in the published list...but without an asterix........I dunno whether that means there is an asterix too many in the list, or 1 too few in the notes!

[landmeister]

This what I spotted  . Do you know if Mr. Barker is going to publish an errata sheet?

[MikeCampbell]

probably sooner or later, but that's a guess on my part