Author Topic: Comments on latest tranche  (Read 2331 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

additz

  • Guest
Comments on latest tranche
« on: September 07, 2009, 08:52:32 PM »
Hi,

can someone explain why Phil is re/acting with attacks on FoG?
What had made him write such an introduction!?

If this should be printed I am sure he will do a huge disservice to himself - and to everybody who still wants to play DBMM.

Axel

MikeCampbell

  • Guest
Re: Comments on latest tranche
« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2009, 01:59:51 AM »
To be honest I think it is largely the doing of some DBMM-ers, who have been harping on to Phil about perceived shortcomings in marketing, competition playability, etc.  That has been an on-going theme on the DBMM list from some people for ages - a year or 2 .....one has to wonder whether they are really DBMM-players or agents-provocoteurs ....:(

Then 1 or 2 comments about DBMM a couple of Slingshots ago produced a burst in the latest one in reply.

Phil has taken a lot of flak for DBMM and has a undestanfdable desire to respon and push the nose of detractors into the declining expectations of TRTMNBN (the rules that must not be named...;)) in recent times.

But I agree that the foreword of DBMM is not the place to do it!!


Valentinian Victor

  • Guest
Re: Comments on latest tranche
« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2009, 11:22:04 AM »
Unfortunately we live in a media rich environment, where people expect a product to have as many 'whistles and flutes' as possible. When you compare the DBMM rulebook against the FOG one you immediately get the impression is has a higher production value, with the inference that it must be a better ruleset. I agree that this is perhaps just an illusion where that ruleset is concerned, but it is non-the-less quite true that a snazzy product captures the audience its aimed at.

I've been wargaming since 1966 and the old school type rulesets a la the old WRG style no longer attract old or new players, who want to have rules that are clear to read, have colour pictures, photo's and diagrams, and at a cheap cost.

I did put forward the suggestion that perhaps on this site we could put up photographs of various examples of play from the rules and then reference this in any new printing of the ruleset, but this fell on stony ground...