Author Topic: Beta Turkoman list mistake?  (Read 3726 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

landmeister

  • Guest
Beta Turkoman list mistake?
« on: April 18, 2010, 11:12:25 AM »
Dear all,

This question has been made at the Yahoolist, but with no response after two weeks, so I try it here, sorry.  :(

Beta list 4/77 White Sheep Turkoman. According to the notes, troops maked * are compulsory if any foot are used. The problem is that Archers are compulsory, so that they will alway be compulsory. Shouldn't Archers be marked * too?

Thank you.

Orcoteuthis

  • Guest
Re: Beta Turkoman list mistake?
« Reply #1 on: April 22, 2010, 12:02:22 PM »
I suspect you're right and that the foot archers should be asterisked too.

Can't give any more "official" answer than that, but I have added it to my (long) list of minor issues to which I'll call Phil's attention when he returns his attention to the list books.

landmeister

  • Guest
Re: Beta Turkoman list mistake?
« Reply #2 on: April 22, 2010, 05:22:59 PM »
Ok. Thank you very much.

Just curious. When will book 4 be available?  ;D

Orcoteuthis

  • Guest
Re: Beta Turkoman list mistake?
« Reply #3 on: April 22, 2010, 05:56:43 PM »
Well, the 2.0 rules are going to be finalized Any Day Real Soon Now, and after that I'd guesstimate a few months work on Bk remains, so perhaps towards late summer or early autumn?

For more definite answers, try consulting goat viscera. ;)

landmeister

  • Guest
Re: Beta Turkoman list mistake?
« Reply #4 on: April 22, 2010, 08:31:49 PM »
I see. Thank you  ;)

Orcoteuthis

  • Guest
Re: Beta Turkoman list mistake?
« Reply #5 on: July 24, 2010, 07:44:06 AM »
In the latest draft, the foot archers are "0, or 6-16", allowing an enitrely mounted army.