This about commands

[landmeister]

I read that now a command must have at least 4 ME of mounted and/or foot. Does it mean that now we can't make commands with WWg and a general only? I play with a later Hungarian including a subgeneral with 4 WWg only. They are train, not foot...

[foxgom]

Hi

Agree.

Your command is illegal (P14 Para 1)

neil

[LAP1964]

That's correct.It was done to stop the unbreakable command i.e.Gen+4 Exp.
LES

[landmeister]

Ok. Thank you very much.

[landmeister]

That's correct.It was done to stop the unbreakable command i.e.Gen+4 Exp.
LES

But this would be legal because Exp count as mounted troops. 

[LAP1964]

That's correct.It was done to stop the unbreakable command i.e.Gen+4 Exp.
LES

But this would be legal because Exp count as mounted troops. 

No as the Exps don't come to at least 4 ME. (Page 14,1st paragraph)
LES

[Orcoteuthis]

To stop the general + Exp or Hd (I) commands, the ME restriction would have been sufficient. I don't recall precisely what, but Phil had something against all-train commands, hence the foot/mtd criterion.

[landmeister]

No as the Exps don't come to at least 4 ME. (Page 14,1st paragraph)
LES

Oooops! You're right!