DBMM Forum

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: landmeister on December 16, 2007, 11:46:34 AM

Title: Why Richard Lionheart is not Brilliant
Post by: landmeister on December 16, 2007, 11:46:34 AM

Bohemund is but Richard is not. Could someone the logic behind that?

Thank you.

Title: Re: Why Richard Lionheart is not Brilliant
Post by: toby on December 17, 2007, 04:27:19 PM

What did Richard do that was Brilliant?

Title: Re: Why Richard Lionheart is not Brilliant
Post by: landmeister on December 17, 2007, 06:52:32 PM

What did Bohemund?

Title: Re: Why Richard Lionheart is not Brilliant
Post by: DaveMather on December 18, 2007, 09:46:48 AM

Quote from: landmeister on December 17, 2007, 06:52:32 PM

What did Bohemund?

His use of a "changing deployment" stratagem as a brilliant stroke versus Alexius Comnenus

He clearly had read the rules on brilliant generals which Richard would appear not to have done  ;)

Regards


David Mather

Title: Re: Why Richard Lionheart is not Brilliant
Post by: landmeister on December 18, 2007, 01:52:58 PM

Quote from: DaveMather on December 18, 2007, 09:46:48 AM

His use of a "changing deployment" stratagem as a brilliant stroke versus Alexius Comnenus

He clearly had read the rules on brilliant generals which Richard would appear not to have done  ;)

Regards


David Mather

LOL!!!!  :D  :D Ok. I thank you.

Title: Re: Why Richard Lionheart is not Brilliant
Post by: toby on December 20, 2007, 03:29:44 PM

Richard's main area of brilliant seems to have been financial, mainly mortgaging and buying low/selling high.