« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Why Richard Lionheart is not Brilliant  (Read 3368 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

landmeister

  • Guest
Why Richard Lionheart is not Brilliant
« on: December 16, 2007, 11:46:34 AM »
Bohemund is but Richard is not. Could someone the logic behind that?

Thank you.
Logged

toby

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Why Richard Lionheart is not Brilliant
« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2007, 04:27:19 PM »
What did Richard do that was Brilliant?
Logged

landmeister

  • Guest
Re: Why Richard Lionheart is not Brilliant
« Reply #2 on: December 17, 2007, 06:52:32 PM »
What did Bohemund?
Logged

DaveMather

  • Bd(O)
  • ***
  • Posts: 133
    • View Profile
Re: Why Richard Lionheart is not Brilliant
« Reply #3 on: December 18, 2007, 09:46:48 AM »
Quote from: landmeister on December 17, 2007, 06:52:32 PM
What did Bohemund?

His use of a "changing deployment" stratagem as a brilliant stroke versus Alexius Comnenus

He clearly had read the rules on brilliant generals which Richard would appear not to have done  ;)

Regards


David Mather
Logged

landmeister

  • Guest
Re: Why Richard Lionheart is not Brilliant
« Reply #4 on: December 18, 2007, 01:52:58 PM »
Quote from: DaveMather on December 18, 2007, 09:46:48 AM

His use of a "changing deployment" stratagem as a brilliant stroke versus Alexius Comnenus

He clearly had read the rules on brilliant generals which Richard would appear not to have done  ;)

Regards


David Mather

LOL!!!!  :D  :D Ok. I thank you.
Logged

toby

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 0
    • View Profile
Re: Why Richard Lionheart is not Brilliant
« Reply #5 on: December 20, 2007, 03:29:44 PM »
Richard's main area of brilliant seems to have been financial, mainly mortgaging and buying low/selling high.
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »